Skilled Readers Rely on Their Brain’s “Visual Dictionary” to Recognize Words

Source: Georgetown University Medical Centre

Skilled readers can recognize words at lightning fast speed when they read because the word has been placed in a visual dictionary of sorts, say Georgetown University Medical Center (GUMC) neuroscientists. The visual dictionary idea rebuts the theory that our brain “sounds out” words each time we see them.

This finding, reported at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Neuroscience 2011, matters because unraveling how the brain solves the complex task of reading can help in uncovering the brain basis of reading disorders, such as dyslexia, say the scientists.

“One camp of neuroscientists believes that we access both the phonology and the visual perception of a word as we read them and that the area or areas of the brain that do one, also do the other, but our study proves this isn’t the case,” says the study’s lead investigator, Laurie Glezer, Ph.D., a postdoctoral research fellow. She works in the Laboratory for Computational Cognitive Neuroscience at GUMC, led by Maximilian Riesenhuber, Ph.D., who is a co-author.

“What we found is that once we’ve learned a word, it is placed in a purely visual dictionary in the brain. Having a purely visual representation allows for the fast and efficient word recognition we see in skilled readers,” she says. “This study is the first demonstration of that concept.”

Glezer says that these findings might help explain why people with dyslexia have slower, more labored reading. “It could be that in dyslexia, because of phonological processing problems, these individuals are not ever able to develop a finely tuned visual representation of the words they have encountered before,” she says. “They can’t take advantage of the fast processing of words using this dictionary.”

Glezer and her co-authors tested word recognition in 12 volunteers using fMRI. They were able to see that words that are different, but sound the same, like “hare” and “hair” activate different neurons, akin to accessing different entries in a dictionary’s catalogue. “If the sounds of the word had influence in this part of the brain we would expect to see that they activate the same or similar neurons, but this was not the case, ‘hair’ and ‘hare’ looked just as different as “hair” and “soup”. This suggests that all we use is the visual information of a word and not the sounds.”

“When we see a word for the first time, it requires some time to read and sound it out, but after perhaps just one presentation of the word, you can recognize it without sounding it out,” she says. “This occurs because our brain first uses phonology to encode the word and match the sound with the written word. Once we do that and encounter the word a few more times, we no longer need the phonology at first, just the visual input to identify the word.”

“We hope these findings will serve as a foundation to examine reading disorders,” Glezer says. “For example, if people with dyslexia have a problem forming this visual dictionary, it may be that there could be ways of helping train children with dyslexia to form a more finely tuned visual dictionary.”

The Dead Speak

Technology has given us so many other things; perhaps in the near future, using Bayesian techniques, we’ll be able to post articles in such a way that we’ll be able to automatically reply to comments long after we’re dead. Just like spam programs keep trying harder and harder to look like regular email in order to get past the filters, auto-replying systems will get better and better at exactly imitating what we would have said to the comment had we been alive.

The Dead Speak.

Perhaps some day we will be able to upload our conscious mind to the cloud as we die. Technology would then be providing us with an after-life.

Inspiration

I was inspired by a piece I read during my Christmas holiday titled “In Defense of the Memory Theater”.

In it, Nathan Schneider describes his bookshelf as a rotating amalgam of whatever my heart desired from the library. Personally, my needs for such a shelf are based much more around being able to quickly retrieve information I unearthed or researched quite some time ago which has suddenly become important to a situation that could benefit from related wisdom.

Nathan presents a hypothetical bookshelf manifesto to cover the basic needs that technology, and more specifically web content management systems, must provide:

for-life, liberatedness, and the pursuit of eclecticism

Look familiar? It should – it’s the tagline of this site.

Break down the manifesto into three parts:

  1. for-life: preserve the collection
  2. “For-life” means the right to keep one’s books as long as one lives and, just as importantly, to pass them on to one’s descendants. They must not be take-away-able by the fiat of a far-away corporation. They must be in a medium and format that will be readable in a hundred years and, if we know what’s good for us, in five thousand.

  3. liberatedness: truly ours, completely free
  4. “Liberatedness” means that the texts are truly ours to do with as we please, short of harming others. We can lend them to enemies and friends. We can mark them up or damage them. We can move them around wherever we like, and wherever the technology allows, freely organizing and categorizing them to all the limits of our private compulsions.

  5. the pursuit of eclecticism: no censorship
  6. Finally, “the pursuit of eclecticism” means that there should be no limit on the breadth of our collections. Plainly, no censorship.

Nathan really nails it describing his own blog and how his collection is pieced together:

The journal I keep on this site is the notes toward an integration still discovering itself—an assembly of thought, education, and experience that is truthful and communicative. My tone and method is precisely speculative: every word is exactly hypothesis. I believe in the importance of free-ranging explanation, while recognizing fearfully that with even the most casual remark we are building ourselves and our world irrevocably.

I, you, we, need to stop committing time and energy to the creation of bookshelves that cannot be sustained. Not if life is really dedicated to building something of grander design than oneself.